top of page

Identify the root performance deficiency & solve the problem.

Front-End Analysis

Human Performance Problem Analysis, also known as Front-End Analysis and Human Performance Engineering, is a procedure that determines all the human support elements needed to produce a measurable business result desired by management, and within the standards set by management and the corporate culture.

Business Meeting

Project Alignment:

The first phase of Front-End Analysis (FEA) is a project alignment.

 

The purpose of a project alignment is to determine what the exact needs of the requesting manager are; this will form the basis for precisely measuring the success of the overall project.

 

Most frequently, requests are made based on “wants” or interventions that will not in and of themselves meet the business goals of the requesting manager.  The most common of these types of requests is a request for training when the total solution will require modifying the motivation system (e.g., people are rewarded for doing the wrong thing and/or punished for doing the right thing) and/or some other non-training support (e.g., tools are needed, the work design is inefficient, inputs are unavailable, etc.).

 

During the alignment phase, the analyst determines exactly what is being requested and what the final business result of the overall project should be, based on the client’s needs.  This need is determined as a function of what is not being produced, i.e., what measurable results the manager is not getting from personnel on the job.  This also forms the basis for calculating the return on investment (ROI) for the project.

 

Since projects never occur in a “perfect world,” during the alignment the analyst also determines what parameters will govern and constrain the conduct of the project.  Examples of parameters and constraints include: deadlines, regulations, safety aspects, political aspects, unwritten rules of the organization that must be followed during the analysis of the project, the people who will assist in terms of scheduling appointments and getting materials, and any areas that are specifically prohibited from being examined or investigated during the analysis.

 

A key element of the alignment is to determine which employees produce the results to standard.  These employees are the ones who will be analyzed to find out exactly how they produce the results that their processes can be documented and then provided either to new employees or current employees who are not producing the result to standard.  If there is no employee who is producing results to standards, then the mastery performance will be evolved.

 

The final result of the alignment phase of the project is for the analyst to clearly understand and have agreement with the client (the requesting manager) as to exactly what will be produced at the end of the project.

 

Examples of accomplishments to be produced at the end of the project include such things as:

 

  • Employees who, at the end of a training program, are competent to produce job-relevant results

  • Equipment operating to specifications after a malfunction

  • Maximum time between failure of systems or equipment

  • Customers who understand the limitations of a system

  • Customer complaints at or below a maximum number

  • Sales of products and services

  • Production and/or quality at or above a specified standard

  • Revenue/profit/costs at specified levels

 

During the project alignment, the analyst will determine if the results the requesting manager wants involves new performance for current employees or by new employees.  If so, a New Performance Planning Front-End Analysis will be done.  If the results management wants are to be produced by current employees doing processes and activities they have done in the past but are now doing below standards, a Diagnostic Front-End Analysis will be done to determine the causes and recommend solutions.

Working Together

Diagnostic Front-End Analysis

During a Diagnostic FEA the analyst will determine exactly why employees are not producing the results to standards. We have found it useful to investigate four major categories as to why employees do not produce results to standard.

 

The categories include a lack of competency on the part of the employee, a lack of support from the work environment, a motivation/incentive system that discourages producing the results, and a personnel selection/assignment that does not put the right person in the right job doing the right assignment at the right time.

 

It is useful to think of these four categories as causes why employees do hot produce the results:

 

  1. The employees do not know how, how well, or when to do some part of the job
     

  2. The employees cannot do some part of the job because they lack tools, time, equipment, or right type and quantity of supervision (e.g., they are being micro-managed [snoopervised], or they are being managed in absentia), or there may be too many interruptions and thus the person is unable to finish a significant portion of a task in one sitting.
     

  3. The employees do not produce the results because they are rewarded for doing it wrong (or below standards), punished for doing it right, or the effort to produce the results to standard greatly exceeds any reward or negative consequences they would incur.
     

  4. The wrong person has been selected for the job and/or given assignments that are distasteful and/or aversive to the employee.

 

During the Diagnostic Front-End Analysis, the precise elements of each of these categories are identified as to which are contributing causes of the employees not producing the results as required by the requesting manager.  Once these causes have been identified, cost effective recommendation that are compatible to the managers’ and the company’s way of doing business are presented.

Modern Office

New Performance Planning Front-End Analysis:

When the requesting manager needs to have current employees do something they have not done before and/or new employees join the company, the New Performance Planning Front-End Analysis determines all of the supporting elements needed to help the employees produce either new results or old results in a new way.

 

Examples of new performance includes going from a manual system to an automated system, changing from one software package to another, changing sales techniques to meet a new competitive strategy, changing the way certain jobs do business to respond to different and changing customer needs.

 

Once the accomplishments and the way of doing things differently have been identified, the analyst will determine with precision the exact criteria for the new results an/or the way in which results are produced.  Such criteria might include production rate, time, quality limits, levels of completeness, safety, cost, legality, and others.

 

We find it useful to specify critical aspects of the new way in which employees are expected to do things.  By determining the criteria, critical aspects, speed, and other aspects of the behavior, the analyst will then determine with precision exactly who should be trained, what they should be trained in, and when they should be trained. In addition, the analyst will specify in detail exactly how much time will be needed to perform the new behavior and produce the results: tools, equipment, software needed, how much protection from interruptions employees need, what type of job-aids and reference materials they will need, what access to assistance from supervisors or technical advisors they will need, and what kind of work design needs to be in place to let employees know how well they are doing and when they are beginning to “miss the mark” – i.e., produce results below standards – and much more (i.e., motivational systems, personnel selection, and more. . . )

Meeting Handshake

In Summary:

The Front-End Analysis determines on the “Front-End” all of the supporting elements needed for employees to produce results required by management.

 

This analysis uses an engineering approach which focuses on the cost effectiveness and efficiency of determining how to help employees produce desired results in a manner that is most acceptable to the manager and the corporation requesting assistance.

Identify the root performance deficiency & solve the problem.

bottom of page